4c:"/_next/static/immutable/chunks/2nw_geu6jm9mp.js" 4d:"QuestionPageClient" 4e:I[666285,["$4","$5","$6","$7","$8","$9","$a","$b","$c","$d","$e","$4c","$1c","$1d","$1e","$1f","$20","$21","$26","$22","$24","$25","$27","$19","$23"],"$4d"] 50:I[27201,["$1"],"IconMark"] 4f:T16c1,February 2009

I finally realized today why politics and religion yield such uniquely useless discussions.

As a rule, any mention of religion on an online forum degenerates into a religious argument. Why? Why does this happen with religion and not with Javascript or baking or other topics people talk about on forums?

What's different about religion is that people don't feel they need to have any particular expertise to have opinions about it. All they need is strongly held beliefs, and anyone can have those. No thread about Javascript will grow as fast as one about religion, because people feel they have to be over some threshold of expertise to post comments about that. But on religion everyone's an expert.

Then it struck me: this is the problem with politics too. Politics, like religion, is a topic where there's no threshold of expertise for expressing an opinion. All you need is strong convictions.

Do religion and politics have something in common that explains this similarity? One possible explanation is that they deal with questions that have no definite answers, so there's no back pressure on people's opinions. Since no one can be proven wrong, every opinion is equally valid, and sensing this, everyone lets fly with theirs.

But this isn't true. There are certainly some political questions that have definite answers, like how much a new government policy will cost. But the more precise political questions suffer the same fate as the vaguer ones.

I think what religion and politics have in common is that they become part of people's identity, and people can never have a fruitful argument about something that's part of their identity. By definition they're partisan.

Which topics engage people's identity depends on the people, not the topic. For example, a discussion about a battle that included citizens of one or more of the countries involved would probably degenerate into a political argument. But a discussion today about a battle that took place in the Bronze Age probably wouldn't. No one would know what side to be on. So it's not politics that's the source of the trouble, but identity. When people say a discussion has degenerated into a religious war, what they really mean is that it has started to be driven mostly by people's identities. [1]

Because the point at which this happens depends on the people rather than the topic, it's a mistake to conclude that because a question tends to provoke religious wars, it must have no answer. For example, the question of the relative merits of programming languages often degenerates into a religious war, because so many programmers identify as X programmers or Y programmers. This sometimes leads people to conclude the question must be unanswerable—that all languages are equally good. Obviously that's false: anything else people make can be well or badly designed; why should this be uniquely impossible for programming languages? And indeed, you can have a fruitful discussion about the relative merits of programming languages, so long as you exclude people who respond from identity.

More generally, you can have a fruitful discussion about a topic only if it doesn't engage the identities of any of the participants. What makes politics and religion such minefields is that they engage so many people's identities. But you could in principle have a useful conversation about them with some people. And there are other topics that might seem harmless, like the relative merits of Ford and Chevy pickup trucks, that you couldn't safely talk about with others.

The most intriguing thing about this theory, if it's right, is that it explains not merely which kinds of discussions to avoid, but how to have better ideas. If people can't think clearly about anything that has become part of their identity, then all other things being equal, the best plan is to let as few things into your identity as possible. [2]

Most people reading this will already be fairly tolerant. But there is a step beyond thinking of yourself as x but tolerating y: not even to consider yourself an x. The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you.

Notes

[1] When that happens, it tends to happen fast, like a core going critical. The threshold for participating goes down to zero, which brings in more people. And they tend to say incendiary things, which draw more and angrier counterarguments.

[2] There may be some things it's a net win to include in your identity. For example, being a scientist. But arguably that is more of a placeholder than an actual label—like putting NMI on a form that asks for your middle initial—because it doesn't commit you to believing anything in particular. A scientist isn't committed to believing in natural selection in the same way a biblical literalist is committed to rejecting it. All he's committed to is following the evidence wherever it leads.

Considering yourself a scientist is equivalent to putting a sign in a cupboard saying "this cupboard must be kept empty." Yes, strictly speaking, you're putting something in the cupboard, but not in the ordinary sense.

Thanks to Sam Altman, Trevor Blackwell, Paul Buchheit, and Robert Morris for reading drafts of this.

2a:["$","$L4e",null,{"sessionId":"tULuO6RvvzjEmhMxgm4za","initialState":{"status":"ready","session":{"_id":"69374f7dd50ea86c979f36a8","sessionId":"tULuO6RvvzjEmhMxgm4za","userId":"public","inputText":"$4f","inputTitle":"Keep Your Identity Small","threads":{"main":[{"input":{},"output":[{"type":"questions","data":[{"index":1,"format":"multiple_choice","question":"Why do discussions about religion on online forums often devolve into arguments more quickly than discussions about topics like JavaScript or baking?","options":["Because religion has clear, provable answers that everyone knows.","Because religion is less interesting than JavaScript or baking.","Because religion requires no expertise to have an opinion, unlike JavaScript or baking.","Because JavaScript and baking are controversial topics."],"correct_answer":"Because religion requires no expertise to have an opinion, unlike JavaScript or baking.","explanation":"The text explains that people feel they don't need any particular expertise to have opinions about religion, while they feel a threshold of expertise is needed for topics like JavaScript. This lack of an expertise threshold allows many people to join and escalate discussions on religion quickly.","objective":"Understand why religion discussions escalate quickly on forums.","bloom_taxonomy":["understand"],"difficulty":"medium","cognitive_load":"medium","estimated_time":2,"id":"mcq-UKzwmrrX747fi5iUd5Tf4","status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":["Because religion requires no expertise to have an opinion, unlike JavaScript or baking.","Because religion is less interesting than JavaScript or baking.","Because JavaScript and baking are controversial topics.","Because religion has clear, provable answers that everyone knows."]},{"index":2,"format":"multiple_choice","question":"According to the text, what is a common reason that politics and religion discussions are prone to 'wars' or unproductive debates?","options":["They are both academic subjects requiring expertise.","They both engage strongly with people's identities.","They both have clear, definite answers.","They are both topics everyone agrees on."],"correct_answer":"They both engage strongly with people's identities.","explanation":"The passage states that what politics and religion share is their engagement with people's identity, making arguments unfruitful because they become partisan and emotionally charged.","objective":"Analyze the common factor that makes politics and religion contentious topics.","bloom_taxonomy":["analyze"],"difficulty":"medium","cognitive_load":"medium","estimated_time":3,"id":"mcq-2OhxekbMheZgvkprkNEH-","status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":["They both engage strongly with people's identities.","They both have clear, definite answers.","They are both academic subjects requiring expertise.","They are both topics everyone agrees on."]},{"index":3,"format":"multiple_choice","question":"What does the author suggest is a mistake when people conclude that a question must have no answer because it provokes 'religious wars'?","options":["Accepting answers given by experts without question.","Assuming that just because an argument is heated, the topic is unanswerable.","Not participating in the argument actively enough.","Avoiding topics like politics and religion altogether."],"correct_answer":"Assuming that just because an argument is heated, the topic is unanswerable.","explanation":"The author argues that the presence of passionate arguments driven by identity does not mean the question has no answer. For example, programming language debates can be fruitful if identity-driven arguments are excluded.","objective":"Evaluate common misconceptions about difficult or heated discussion topics.","bloom_taxonomy":["evaluate"],"difficulty":"medium","cognitive_load":"medium","estimated_time":3,"id":"mcq-qmNIwcHiiCYB3NAiR-wq2","status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":["Assuming that just because an argument is heated, the topic is unanswerable.","Not participating in the argument actively enough.","Accepting answers given by experts without question.","Avoiding topics like politics and religion altogether."]},{"index":4,"format":"multiple_choice","question":"What advice does the author give toward having better ideas and clearer thinking?","options":["Strongly commit to many identities for better clarity.","Avoid participation in any discussions.","Become an expert in all topics before expressing opinions.","Limit the number of things that become part of your identity."],"correct_answer":"Limit the number of things that become part of your identity.","explanation":"The author suggests that since people can't think clearly about things tied to their identity, it's best to keep as few things tied to your identity as possible to improve thinking and ideas.","objective":"Apply the concept of identity's influence on thinking to personal development.","bloom_taxonomy":["apply"],"difficulty":"medium","cognitive_load":"medium","estimated_time":2,"id":"mcq-2KXSe---tbjr8wBV3V_Qj","status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":["Limit the number of things that become part of your identity.","Strongly commit to many identities for better clarity.","Avoid participation in any discussions.","Become an expert in all topics before expressing opinions."]},{"index":5,"format":"multiple_choice","question":"Which example does the author use to illustrate that a discussion's contentiousness depends on participants' identities rather than the topic itself?","options":["Economics vs. physics.","Football vs. basketball games.","A battle involving citizens of involved countries vs. a Bronze Age battle.","Programming languages vs. baking recipes."],"correct_answer":"A battle involving citizens of involved countries vs. a Bronze Age battle.","explanation":"The author contrasts discussions about a battle involving living citizens (likely causing political arguments) with one in the Bronze Age (where no one identifies a side), showing identity drives contention.","objective":"Understand how participant identity influences discussion dynamics.","bloom_taxonomy":["understand"],"difficulty":"medium","cognitive_load":"medium","estimated_time":2,"id":"mcq-CHjxBo1xX4ztw17QjuUyG","status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":["A battle involving citizens of involved countries vs. a Bronze Age battle.","Football vs. basketball games.","Programming languages vs. baking recipes.","Economics vs. physics."]},{"index":6,"format":"multiple_choice","question":"According to the notes, why might considering oneself a scientist be different from adopting other identities like a biblical literalist?","options":["Because scientists always believe in natural selection.","Because scientists follow evidence rather than beliefs.","Because scientists have no opinions.","Because scientists never participate in arguments."],"correct_answer":"Because scientists follow evidence rather than beliefs.","explanation":"The note explains that a scientist as an identity is more a placeholder, committed to following evidence, unlike other identities that commit to fixed beliefs.","objective":"Analyze how different identities affect belief systems and openness to evidence.","bloom_taxonomy":["analyze"],"difficulty":"hard","cognitive_load":"high","estimated_time":4,"id":"mcq-4T9o0X87PRqN_uAViptZN","status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":["Because scientists follow evidence rather than beliefs.","Because scientists have no opinions.","Because scientists never participate in arguments.","Because scientists always believe in natural selection."]},{"index":7,"format":"true_false","question":"True or False: According to the text, everyone can be considered an expert when discussing religion online.","correct_answer":"False","explanation":"The text states that people do not feel the need for expertise to express opinions about religion, but it does not say everyone is an actual expert; rather, strong beliefs substitute for expertise.","objective":"Recall the reason why religious discussions lack expertise threshold.","bloom_taxonomy":["remember"],"difficulty":"easy","cognitive_load":"low","estimated_time":1,"id":"true_false-H7Pc5S0KlNtNhMCnCJ8nZ","status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":null},{"index":8,"format":"true_false","question":"True or False: The author believes that programming language debates can never be productive because they always become identity-driven.","correct_answer":"False","explanation":"The author states that programming language debates can be productive if identity-driven arguments are excluded, proving some fruitful discussion is possible.","objective":"Understand the conditions for productive discussion on identity-laden topics.","bloom_taxonomy":["understand"],"difficulty":"medium","cognitive_load":"medium","estimated_time":2,"id":"true_false-rnmkxB4CDjDOQTF9Fhdme","status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":null},{"index":9,"format":"true_false","question":"True or False: The author suggests that discussions about politics and religion engage many people's identities, making them difficult topics to discuss rationally.","correct_answer":"True","explanation":"The main thesis is that politics and religion engage identities deeply, making rational and fruitful discussion difficult due to partisanship and emotional attachment.","objective":"Remember the primary reason politics and religion make difficult discussion topics.","bloom_taxonomy":["remember"],"difficulty":"easy","cognitive_load":"low","estimated_time":1,"id":"true_false-5Q_AEV_LcJj1HN2np5CSk","status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":null},{"index":10,"format":"short_answer","question":"Why does the author say that political questions with definite answers still suffer from unproductive debates?","correct_answer":"Because the debates are often driven by people's identities and partisan views rather than by facts alone, even on questions with definite answers.","explanation":"The text explains that even though some political questions have definite answers, discussions about them suffer because identity influences and partisanship overpower factual considerations.","objective":"Explain the impact of identity on political debate quality.","bloom_taxonomy":["understand"],"difficulty":"medium","cognitive_load":"medium","estimated_time":3,"id":"short_answer-Lw69WGwgBmYyit896rpK6","status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":null},{"index":11,"format":"short_answer","question":"What does the author mean by saying 'The threshold for participating goes down to zero' in certain discussions?","correct_answer":"It means that anyone can join the discussion regardless of expertise, which leads to more people participating and often causes the discussion to become heated and unproductive.","explanation":"This phrase describes how in identity-driven topics like religion, the need for expertise to participate disappears, bringing in more participants who may inflame the discussion.","objective":"Interpret a key phrase related to discussion dynamics.","bloom_taxonomy":["analyze"],"difficulty":"medium","cognitive_load":"medium","estimated_time":3,"id":"short_answer-ww474vAHjon5PqQe5IKgK","status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":null},{"index":12,"format":"short_answer","question":"What is the author's recommendation for handling topics that engage identity to avoid unproductive arguments?","correct_answer":"The author recommends limiting the number of things that become part of your identity, as this allows for clearer thinking and less biased discussions.","explanation":"By not strongly identifying with many topics, a person can avoid emotional partisanship and participate in more rational, productive discussions.","objective":"Apply the author's advice to personal identity and discussion management.","bloom_taxonomy":["apply"],"difficulty":"medium","cognitive_load":"medium","estimated_time":3,"id":"short_answer-2D-xts_FvQ_ot734uiCtE","status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":null},{"index":1,"format":"multiple_choice","question":"What does the text imply about heated discussions on online forums?","options":["They are often dominated by expert opinions.","They lack depth because of low expertise threshold.","They only engage a small audience.","They are primarily about factual evidence."],"correct_answer":"They lack depth because of low expertise threshold.","explanation":"The text discusses how the absence of a need for expertise allows anyone to contribute, often leading to superficial discussions rather than in-depth, informed debates.","objective":"Understand the dynamics of heated discussions on online forums.","bloom_taxonomy":["understand"],"difficulty":"medium","cognitive_load":"medium","estimated_time":2,"id":"mcq-dBLhyMIX0HTW1VNGidLHP","status":"pending"},{"index":2,"format":"multiple_choice","question":"In what way does the author suggest that different topics can evoke partisan discussions?","options":["By being universally agreed upon.","By not engaging any participant's identity.","By triggering strong personal beliefs in participants.","By being inherently controversial."],"correct_answer":"By triggering strong personal beliefs in participants.","explanation":"The author argues that discussions become partisan because they engage identities, which are closely tied to personal beliefs.","objective":"Analyze the relationship between discussion topics and participant identity.","bloom_taxonomy":["analyze"],"difficulty":"medium","cognitive_load":"medium","estimated_time":2,"id":"mcq-NpDCS1teklMwdQOpIFh1s","status":"pending"},{"index":3,"format":"true_false","question":"True or False: The author believes that fewer identities lead to clearer thinking during discussions.","correct_answer":"True","explanation":"The author suggests that limiting the identities we adopt allows us to think more clearly and engage in more productive discussions.","objective":"Recall the author's viewpoint on identity and clarity of thought.","bloom_taxonomy":["remember"],"difficulty":"easy","cognitive_load":"low","estimated_time":1,"id":"true_false-k3LPUSAEbXAVdm9VpIjkT","status":"pending"},{"index":4,"format":"true_false","question":"True or False: The text states that the existence of strong opinions guarantees productive debates.","correct_answer":"False","explanation":"Strong opinions do not guarantee productive debate; they can often lead to heated and unfruitful arguments, especially when tied to identity.","objective":"Identify misconceptions about strong opinions in debates.","bloom_taxonomy":["understand"],"difficulty":"medium","cognitive_load":"medium","estimated_time":2,"id":"true_false-QQyLhHsb395q7GSKXL9XH","status":"pending"},{"index":5,"format":"short_answer","question":"What is the significance of the phrase 'the threshold for participating goes down to zero' in discussions?","correct_answer":"It indicates that anyone feels free to join the discussion without needing expertise, leading to more participants and possibly more chaos.","explanation":"This phrase reveals how the lack of expertise requirement brings in varied opinions, which can often dilute discussion quality.","objective":"Interpret the meaning of a key phrase in the context of discussion dynamics.","bloom_taxonomy":["analyze"],"difficulty":"medium","cognitive_load":"medium","estimated_time":2,"id":"short_answer-R1UHE9HWcW29nwo3ySOnR","status":"pending"},{"index":6,"format":"short_answer","question":"According to the author, why should one limit the number of identities they take on?","correct_answer":"One should limit identities to avoid emotional biases and to promote clearer thinking in discussions.","explanation":"By not tying many aspects of oneself to identity, one can engage in discussions more rationally and with an open mind.","objective":"Apply the author's recommendations for identity management in discussions.","bloom_taxonomy":["apply"],"difficulty":"medium","cognitive_load":"medium","estimated_time":3,"id":"short_answer-vWyb4dQ7CzhxERh3VZD2R","status":"pending"}]}],"responseId":null,"createdAt":"2025-12-08T22:21:49.659Z"}]},"createdAt":"2025-12-08T22:21:49.659Z","updatedAt":"2026-11-02T08:27:16.760Z"}},"returnUrl":"/questions/tULuO6RvvzjEmhMxgm4za"}] 2d:null 33:[["$","title","0",{"children":"Keep Your Identity Small - Make Questions"}],["$","meta","1",{"name":"description","content":"Explore questions about Keep Your Identity Small on Make Questions."}],["$","meta","2",{"name":"author","content":"Karson AI"}],["$","meta","3",{"name":"creator","content":"Karson AI"}],["$","meta","4",{"name":"publisher","content":"Make Questions"}],["$","meta","5",{"name":"robots","content":"index, follow"}],["$","meta","6",{"name":"category","content":"education"}],["$","link","7",{"rel":"canonical","href":"https://makequestions.ai/questions/tULuO6RvvzjEmhMxgm4za"}],["$","meta","8",{"name":"format-detection","content":"telephone=no, address=no, email=no"}],["$","meta","9",{"property":"og:title","content":"Keep Your Identity Small"}],["$","meta","10",{"property":"og:description","content":"Explore questions about Keep Your Identity Small on Make Questions."}],["$","meta","11",{"property":"og:url","content":"https://makequestions.ai/questions/tULuO6RvvzjEmhMxgm4za"}],["$","meta","12",{"property":"og:site_name","content":"Make Questions"}],["$","meta","13",{"property":"og:locale","content":"en_US"}],["$","meta","14",{"property":"og:image","content":"https://makequestions.ai/opengraph-image"}],["$","meta","15",{"property":"og:image:width","content":"1200"}],["$","meta","16",{"property":"og:image:height","content":"630"}],["$","meta","17",{"property":"og:image:alt","content":"Make Questions"}],["$","meta","18",{"property":"og:type","content":"website"}],["$","meta","19",{"name":"twitter:card","content":"summary_large_image"}],["$","meta","20",{"name":"twitter:title","content":"Keep Your Identity Small"}],["$","meta","21",{"name":"twitter:description","content":"Explore questions about Keep Your Identity Small on Make Questions."}],["$","meta","22",{"name":"twitter:image","content":"https://makequestions.ai/opengraph-image"}],["$","meta","23",{"name":"twitter:image:alt","content":"Make Questions"}],["$","meta","24",{"name":"twitter:image:width","content":"1200"}],["$","meta","25",{"name":"twitter:image:height","content":"630"}],["$","link","26",{"rel":"shortcut icon","href":"/favicon.ico"}],["$","link","27",{"rel":"icon","href":"/favicon.ico","sizes":"16x16 32x32 48x48"}],["$","link","28",{"rel":"icon","href":"/favicon.png","type":"image/png","sizes":"32x32"}],["$","link","29",{"rel":"icon","href":"/favicon.svg","type":"image/svg+xml"}],["$","link","30",{"rel":"apple-touch-icon","href":"/apple-touch-icon.png"}],["$","$L50","31",{}]]