4c:"/_next/static/immutable/chunks/2nw_geu6jm9mp.js" 4d:"QuestionPageClient" 4e:I[666285,["$4","$5","$6","$7","$8","$9","$a","$b","$c","$d","$e","$4c","$1c","$1d","$1e","$1f","$20","$21","$26","$22","$24","$25","$27","$19","$23"],"$4d"] 50:I[27201,["$1"],"IconMark"] 4f:T16c1,February 2009

I finally realized today why politics and religion yield such uniquely useless discussions.

As a rule, any mention of religion on an online forum degenerates into a religious argument. Why? Why does this happen with religion and not with Javascript or baking or other topics people talk about on forums?

What's different about religion is that people don't feel they need to have any particular expertise to have opinions about it. All they need is strongly held beliefs, and anyone can have those. No thread about Javascript will grow as fast as one about religion, because people feel they have to be over some threshold of expertise to post comments about that. But on religion everyone's an expert.

Then it struck me: this is the problem with politics too. Politics, like religion, is a topic where there's no threshold of expertise for expressing an opinion. All you need is strong convictions.

Do religion and politics have something in common that explains this similarity? One possible explanation is that they deal with questions that have no definite answers, so there's no back pressure on people's opinions. Since no one can be proven wrong, every opinion is equally valid, and sensing this, everyone lets fly with theirs.

But this isn't true. There are certainly some political questions that have definite answers, like how much a new government policy will cost. But the more precise political questions suffer the same fate as the vaguer ones.

I think what religion and politics have in common is that they become part of people's identity, and people can never have a fruitful argument about something that's part of their identity. By definition they're partisan.

Which topics engage people's identity depends on the people, not the topic. For example, a discussion about a battle that included citizens of one or more of the countries involved would probably degenerate into a political argument. But a discussion today about a battle that took place in the Bronze Age probably wouldn't. No one would know what side to be on. So it's not politics that's the source of the trouble, but identity. When people say a discussion has degenerated into a religious war, what they really mean is that it has started to be driven mostly by people's identities. [1]

Because the point at which this happens depends on the people rather than the topic, it's a mistake to conclude that because a question tends to provoke religious wars, it must have no answer. For example, the question of the relative merits of programming languages often degenerates into a religious war, because so many programmers identify as X programmers or Y programmers. This sometimes leads people to conclude the question must be unanswerable—that all languages are equally good. Obviously that's false: anything else people make can be well or badly designed; why should this be uniquely impossible for programming languages? And indeed, you can have a fruitful discussion about the relative merits of programming languages, so long as you exclude people who respond from identity.

More generally, you can have a fruitful discussion about a topic only if it doesn't engage the identities of any of the participants. What makes politics and religion such minefields is that they engage so many people's identities. But you could in principle have a useful conversation about them with some people. And there are other topics that might seem harmless, like the relative merits of Ford and Chevy pickup trucks, that you couldn't safely talk about with others.

The most intriguing thing about this theory, if it's right, is that it explains not merely which kinds of discussions to avoid, but how to have better ideas. If people can't think clearly about anything that has become part of their identity, then all other things being equal, the best plan is to let as few things into your identity as possible. [2]

Most people reading this will already be fairly tolerant. But there is a step beyond thinking of yourself as x but tolerating y: not even to consider yourself an x. The more labels you have for yourself, the dumber they make you.

Notes

[1] When that happens, it tends to happen fast, like a core going critical. The threshold for participating goes down to zero, which brings in more people. And they tend to say incendiary things, which draw more and angrier counterarguments.

[2] There may be some things it's a net win to include in your identity. For example, being a scientist. But arguably that is more of a placeholder than an actual label—like putting NMI on a form that asks for your middle initial—because it doesn't commit you to believing anything in particular. A scientist isn't committed to believing in natural selection in the same way a biblical literalist is committed to rejecting it. All he's committed to is following the evidence wherever it leads.

Considering yourself a scientist is equivalent to putting a sign in a cupboard saying "this cupboard must be kept empty." Yes, strictly speaking, you're putting something in the cupboard, but not in the ordinary sense.

Thanks to Sam Altman, Trevor Blackwell, Paul Buchheit, and Robert Morris for reading drafts of this.

2a:["$","$L4e",null,{"sessionId":"zYvq7Nwyze9h2t7QHpDY5","initialState":{"status":"ready","session":{"_id":"693f2ea5508f941bf1f012db","sessionId":"zYvq7Nwyze9h2t7QHpDY5","userId":"public","inputText":"$4f","inputTitle":"Keep Your Identity Small","threads":{"main":[{"input":{},"output":[{"type":"questions","data":[{"index":1,"format":"multiple_choice","difficulty":"easy","question":"According to the passage, why do discussions about religion on online forums often become arguments?","options":["Because people feel no need for expertise to express opinions on religion","Because religion is less important than other topics","Because forums restrict religious discussions","Because people lack interest in religion"],"correct_answer":"Because people feel no need for expertise to express opinions on religion","explanation":"The passage explains that religion-related discussions on forums often become arguments because people don't feel they need expertise to have opinions, just strong beliefs, making everyone feel like an expert.","objective":"Understand why religious discussions on forums often become argumentative.","bloom_taxonomy":["understand"],"tags":["religion_discussion","online_forums","expertise_threshold"],"id":"mcq-hV_X6tHe6UQUWzI70GvF0","sequence":1,"status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":["Because people lack interest in religion","Because people feel no need for expertise to express opinions on religion","Because religion is less important than other topics","Because forums restrict religious discussions"]},{"index":2,"format":"multiple_choice","difficulty":"medium","question":"What common factor does the author identify as the main reason politics and religion discussions become unproductive?","options":["They engage people's identities strongly","They involve complex data analysis","They lack definitive answers","They require specialized knowledge"],"correct_answer":"They engage people's identities strongly","explanation":"The author argues that politics and religion become unproductive because they become part of people's identities, making arguments partisan and less fruitful.","objective":"Analyze the reason why politics and religion discussions often become unproductive.","bloom_taxonomy":["analyze"],"tags":["politics","religion","identity","argumentation"],"id":"mcq-ozJQ5iiC4u5jhwmEf4OPL","sequence":2,"status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":["They involve complex data analysis","They lack definitive answers","They engage people's identities strongly","They require specialized knowledge"]},{"index":3,"format":"multiple_choice","difficulty":"medium","question":"According to the passage, which statement best describes discussions about programming languages?","options":["They are less important than political discussions","They are always clear-cut and factual","They never provoke identity-driven arguments","They sometimes provoke religious wars due to identity affiliation"],"correct_answer":"They sometimes provoke religious wars due to identity affiliation","explanation":"The text illustrates that programming language discussions can degenerate into 'religious wars' because programmers often identify strongly with particular languages, which brings identity into the discussion.","objective":"Understand the role of identity in technical discussions about programming languages.","bloom_taxonomy":["understand"],"tags":["programming_languages","identity","arguments"],"id":"mcq-sn6QrP9vB2N2tUCXIL-Bo","sequence":3,"status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":["They never provoke identity-driven arguments","They are always clear-cut and factual","They sometimes provoke religious wars due to identity affiliation","They are less important than political discussions"]},{"index":4,"format":"true_false","difficulty":"easy","question":"The author claims that everyone needs strong expertise before expressing an opinion about politics.","correct_answer":"False","explanation":"The passage states politics, like religion, requires no threshold of expertise, only strong convictions, for people to express opinions.","objective":"Remember the author's view on expertise requirement in political discussions.","bloom_taxonomy":["remember"],"tags":["politics","expertise","opinions"],"id":"true_false-v1Jiy77dQWv1EUyDYoe0-","sequence":4,"status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":null},{"index":5,"format":"true_false","difficulty":"medium","question":"Discussions about ancient battles are less likely to devolve into political arguments because they typically do not engage personal identities.","correct_answer":"True","explanation":"The author explains that ancient battles are less likely to provoke political arguments since people generally have no side to identify with, thus the identity factor is absent.","objective":"Apply the concept of identity's role in discussion dynamics to historical contexts.","bloom_taxonomy":["apply"],"tags":["identity","historical_discussions","political_arguments"],"id":"true_false-p08BKtg7UtqrulijX7tXL","sequence":5,"status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":null},{"index":6,"format":"true_false","difficulty":"hard","question":"According to the passage, having multiple labels or identities for oneself enhances clear thinking and reduces bias.","correct_answer":"False","explanation":"The passage suggests that the more labels or identities one has, the 'dumber' it makes them, implying these labels impair clear thinking and increase bias.","objective":"Evaluate the impact of self-labeling on cognitive clarity.","bloom_taxonomy":["evaluate"],"tags":["self_identity","labels","cognitive_bias"],"id":"true_false-BnoVlcDyypT3m67z22w7L","sequence":6,"status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":null},{"index":7,"format":"short_answer","difficulty":"easy","question":"Why do people express strong opinions readily about religion and politics compared to other topics?","correct_answer":"Because these topics don't require any particular expertise, just strong beliefs or convictions, making everyone feel like an expert.","explanation":"The passage highlights that religion and politics discussions attract strong opinions because everyone feels qualified based solely on their beliefs, unlike technical topics that require expertise.","objective":"Recall reasons for strong opinions on religion and politics.","bloom_taxonomy":["remember"],"tags":["opinions","religion","politics","expertise"],"id":"short_answer-zgowCQjyBsOVgFwes-4Ha","sequence":7,"status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":null},{"index":8,"format":"short_answer","difficulty":"medium","question":"Explain how identity influences the nature of arguments in discussions about politics and religion.","correct_answer":"Identity makes arguments partisan because when topics become part of people’s identities, their opinions are deeply held and less open to change, leading to unfruitful, emotionally-driven discussions.","explanation":"The author argues that identity attachment causes discussions to become polarized and less productive as personal stakes increase and openness decreases.","objective":"Explain the relationship between identity and argument quality in sensitive topics.","bloom_taxonomy":["understand","analyze"],"tags":["identity","arguments","politics","religion"],"id":"short_answer-LwvXjOycszMNIierDTewe","sequence":8,"status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":null},{"index":9,"format":"short_answer","difficulty":"hard","question":"According to the passage, what strategy could help people have better ideas and clearer thinking?","correct_answer":"A strategy is to limit the number of things that become part of one’s identity, thereby reducing biases and allowing clearer, more objective thinking.","explanation":"The passage concludes that letting fewer things define your identity helps avoid biased thinking tied to personal labels, promoting better ideas and clarity.","objective":"Evaluate and create strategies for improving thinking based on the passage's theory.","bloom_taxonomy":["evaluate","create"],"tags":["identity","critical_thinking","bias_reduction"],"id":"short_answer-Fu7DNsYypbcwqEuEdVNNx","sequence":9,"status":"active","parentIds":[],"alternativeIds":[],"originalOptionsOrder":null},{"index":1,"format":"multiple_choice","difficulty":"medium","question":"What does the author suggest is a consequence of identifying strongly with certain political or religious beliefs?","options":["People can have fruitful discussions.","Discussions can become less focused on facts.","Everyone's opinion is equally valid.","It encourages collaboration."],"correct_answer":"Discussions can become less focused on facts.","explanation":"The author explains that when discussions engage personal identity, they tend to stray from constructive dialogue and focus more on convictions.","objective":"To assess understanding of the implications of identity on discussions about contentious topics.","bloom_taxonomy":["understand"],"tags":["identity_influence","political_discussion","belief_system"],"id":"mcq-LdGwWQSjJ9S-l2zdG8iuS","sequence":10,"status":"pending"},{"index":2,"format":"multiple_choice","difficulty":"medium","question":"According to the author, which scenario is likely to lead to a productive discussion?","options":["Debating the importance of religious beliefs.","Discussing a neutral historical topic.","Comparing modern political ideologies.","Arguing about sports teams."],"correct_answer":"Discussing a neutral historical topic.","explanation":"Neutral historical topics are less likely to engage personal identity, allowing for more constructive dialogue.","objective":"To identify the conditions for productive discussions in the context of identity.","bloom_taxonomy":["apply"],"tags":["discussion_subjects","productive_dialogue","neutral_topics"],"id":"mcq-Cj3LWjAp16x-ZUca_z30B","sequence":11,"status":"pending"},{"index":3,"format":"true_false","difficulty":"easy","question":"The author believes that people often think of programming languages as equally valid because they identify strongly with them.","correct_answer":"true","explanation":"The author discusses that identification with programming languages can lead people to believe all are equally good.","objective":"To evaluate comprehension of the relationship between identity and subjective opinions.","bloom_taxonomy":["evaluate"],"tags":["programming_languages","identity_conflict","subjective_opinions"],"id":"true_false-yocoLshVhrJtKeor7PNbS","sequence":12,"status":"pending"},{"index":4,"format":"true_false","difficulty":"easy","question":"According to the author, having fewer identities may enhance a person's ability to think clearly.","correct_answer":"true","explanation":"The author argues that minimizing identities can lead to clearer thinking, as fewer things engage emotional investment.","objective":"To assess understanding of the author's perspective on identity.","bloom_taxonomy":["understand"],"tags":["clear_thinking","identity","philosophy"],"id":"true_false-zelDeIJoxi9XiLTq2s77B","sequence":13,"status":"pending"},{"index":5,"format":"short_answer","difficulty":"medium","question":"What does the author propose as a strategy for avoiding heated arguments in discussions?","correct_answer":"The author suggests minimizing the number of topics that engage one's identity to foster better discussions.","explanation":"Engaging with topics that do not connect to personal identity can lead to more effective, impartial discussions.","objective":"To encourage reflection on strategies for productive dialogue.","bloom_taxonomy":["create"],"tags":["discussion_strategies","identity_management","argumentation"],"id":"short_answer-UaJmpBa2yKNjbEIEk1CPO","sequence":14,"status":"archived"},{"index":6,"format":"short_answer","difficulty":"medium","question":"How does the author relate identity to the nature of arguments in discussions about politics and religion?","correct_answer":"The author states that identity becomes tied to opinions in discussions about politics and religion, leading to more partisan arguments.","explanation":"Such identity-driven arguments hinder fruitful discussions as they are influenced by personal convictions rather than objective analysis.","objective":"To assess understanding of the impact of identity on argumentative discourse.","bloom_taxonomy":["understand"],"tags":["identity_impact","politics_religion","discussion_analysis"],"id":"short_answer-UbfdrT8D-_gSVT6gLhphn","sequence":15,"status":"pending"}]}],"responseId":null,"createdAt":"2025-12-14T21:39:49.670Z"}]},"createdAt":"2025-12-14T21:39:49.670Z","updatedAt":"2026-11-02T08:24:53.933Z"}},"returnUrl":"/questions/zYvq7Nwyze9h2t7QHpDY5"}] 2d:null 33:[["$","title","0",{"children":"Keep Your Identity Small - Make Questions"}],["$","meta","1",{"name":"description","content":"Explore questions about Keep Your Identity Small on Make Questions."}],["$","meta","2",{"name":"author","content":"Karson AI"}],["$","meta","3",{"name":"creator","content":"Karson AI"}],["$","meta","4",{"name":"publisher","content":"Make Questions"}],["$","meta","5",{"name":"robots","content":"index, follow"}],["$","meta","6",{"name":"category","content":"education"}],["$","link","7",{"rel":"canonical","href":"https://makequestions.ai/questions/zYvq7Nwyze9h2t7QHpDY5"}],["$","meta","8",{"name":"format-detection","content":"telephone=no, address=no, email=no"}],["$","meta","9",{"property":"og:title","content":"Keep Your Identity Small"}],["$","meta","10",{"property":"og:description","content":"Explore questions about Keep Your Identity Small on Make Questions."}],["$","meta","11",{"property":"og:url","content":"https://makequestions.ai/questions/zYvq7Nwyze9h2t7QHpDY5"}],["$","meta","12",{"property":"og:site_name","content":"Make Questions"}],["$","meta","13",{"property":"og:locale","content":"en_US"}],["$","meta","14",{"property":"og:image","content":"https://makequestions.ai/opengraph-image"}],["$","meta","15",{"property":"og:image:width","content":"1200"}],["$","meta","16",{"property":"og:image:height","content":"630"}],["$","meta","17",{"property":"og:image:alt","content":"Make Questions"}],["$","meta","18",{"property":"og:type","content":"website"}],["$","meta","19",{"name":"twitter:card","content":"summary_large_image"}],["$","meta","20",{"name":"twitter:title","content":"Keep Your Identity Small"}],["$","meta","21",{"name":"twitter:description","content":"Explore questions about Keep Your Identity Small on Make Questions."}],["$","meta","22",{"name":"twitter:image","content":"https://makequestions.ai/opengraph-image"}],["$","meta","23",{"name":"twitter:image:alt","content":"Make Questions"}],["$","meta","24",{"name":"twitter:image:width","content":"1200"}],["$","meta","25",{"name":"twitter:image:height","content":"630"}],["$","link","26",{"rel":"shortcut icon","href":"/favicon.ico"}],["$","link","27",{"rel":"icon","href":"/favicon.ico","sizes":"16x16 32x32 48x48"}],["$","link","28",{"rel":"icon","href":"/favicon.png","type":"image/png","sizes":"32x32"}],["$","link","29",{"rel":"icon","href":"/favicon.svg","type":"image/svg+xml"}],["$","link","30",{"rel":"apple-touch-icon","href":"/apple-touch-icon.png"}],["$","$L50","31",{}]]